Updates Arrive In Pieces
One producer sends a spreadsheet, another sends a message, and someone has not reported yet. You are still assembling the picture when the meeting starts.
Know who is writing business, who needs support, and where to focus your next conversation. Kadence turns your production records into clear team reports, with agency views for owners and downline views for IMOs.
Your producers report in different ways, and the totals arrive after the conversation should have happened. Getting a fair picture of team performance takes too much preparation.
One producer sends a spreadsheet, another sends a message, and someone has not reported yet. You are still assembling the picture when the meeting starts.
One report counts submitted business while another counts issued policies. Side-by-side totals look useful until you discover they are measuring different stages.
A producer who needs support can disappear inside a team total. By the time you look closer, several check-ins have passed without a useful conversation.
More producers mean more records to reconcile. For IMOs, an added layer of downline relationships makes it harder to see which group needs attention.
See the people behind the total, compare the same reporting period, and take a clear picture into your next team review.
Bring your production records into the reporting process set up for your account. Your team supplies the data for the period you want to review.
Associate the records with the producers and teams responsible for the business. For IMOs, the supplied downline relationships also shape the hierarchy view.
Review the same measures across the same reporting period. When your records support submitted and issued business, keep those stages distinct so the comparison means something.
Look beyond the team total to see where production is coming from. Use the individual picture to decide who deserves recognition and who needs a closer conversation.
Bring the production records into your check-in and ask what is helping or holding the producer back. Your managers add the context and decide what support comes next.
Recognize the people writing business, spot where a closer conversation is needed, and spend your meeting on the next step.
Open the team reports instead of collecting another round of updates.
Discuss a producer's records and the support they need to move forward.
See who wrote the business in the production records your team supplied.
Use consistent definitions and periods when reviewing the team.
Connect the reported work to the people responsible for it.
Spot the people behind the team total who need a closer conversation.
Count the hours managers spend gathering production updates. Model time released by reports built around agreed definitions and available data.
Choose an assumption to explore. This is your scenario, not a measured Kadence result.
People consolidating updates across your agency or IMO.
Exclude coaching and decisions: those still need your judgment.
Time value is not cash savings unless paid hours or outside costs actually fall.
34.7 reporting hours released per month in this scenario
Annual value of reporting time released
$16,640
That is $1,387 in monthly time value, not guaranteed production.
Annual value of reporting time released: $16,640. $1,387 in monthly time value, not guaranteed production.
Illustrative value of time released, not guaranteed savings or a reduction in payroll. Weekly models use 52 weeks per year. Excludes Kadence fees and usage. Do not add overlapping scenarios. How we calculate this
We confirm your team structure, source records, and reporting definitions. Your leaders review a sample period before using the reports in team conversations.
We identify the producers, teams, and reporting responsibilities. For IMOs, we also confirm the downline relationships the hierarchy view will use.
We agree on measures, periods, and appropriate access. Your team confirms which source data can support the requested views.
We configure the reports using your source records and team structure. You review a sample period to confirm the people and definitions line up.
We walk your leaders through the views and update routine. Your next team review starts with a shared picture and clear context.
How team reporting fits your agency or IMO and available data.
You can review production by the people, teams, and periods included in your setup, using the records you supply. We confirm the supported measures, producer identifiers, and definitions before configuring the reports. Your leaders can then use the individual and team views to guide check-ins.
Both, with different views. Independent agencies get team and production reporting suited to their organization. Downline and organizational hierarchy views are for IMOs and are configured around the relationships and data supplied during setup.
Not by default. Reporting depends on the agreed source data and intake process. We do not promise a universal carrier connection or live synchronization. We review your sources and establish an update schedule during setup.
If your supplied records support those stages, we can include them in the agreed reporting scope. We define each measure separately so submitted business is not mistaken for issued business, paid commission, or another stage.
The view depends on the organizational relationships and producer identifiers supplied by your IMO. We agree on how changes are provided and reflected in the reporting. Your team remains responsible for confirming that the supplied hierarchy is current and correct.
No. Reports help managers decide where to look and which questions to ask. Your leaders still provide coaching, understand individual circumstances, and agree on the actions that follow a review.
Team reporting shows who is producing and the business recorded for each reporting period. Commission tracking and reconciliation use carrier statements and your records to examine the money side. Both can be included in your setup, but a production total is not a payment confirmation.
Timing depends on your organization, the measures requested, and the condition of the source data. We confirm the scope after reviewing samples, then configure and review the reports with your team before launch.
Still have a question? Email us at hi@startkadence.com
See your producers, understand the numbers, and focus your next team conversation.